Having harmony across any establishment from it's top most representative / leader to the various lower rung folks who execute the establishment's agenda / road map / manifesto to their best efforts, is the prime concern for any leader who holds the reigns of that establishment.
If one has to take an example of the current ruling party TRS,
Hon'ble CM KCR ----> Cabinet Ministers ----> MLA's ----> Corporators ----> Various Party representatives at different levels ----> & all party members / cadre.
Whatever CM aspires to be the party's agenda / road map for the state's well being, is ought to percolate down via the above mentioned downstream cascaded channel of various superiors unconditionally.
If there are any differences at any level of the chain, it is quite obvious that one has to resolve them internally without significantly affecting the allied members at any part of the larger chain.
Just for the sake of an example, if three MLAs have any issues among each other why should that affect their lower rung folks who might have worked for any of them simply because they believed that they are working for the party at large or it's head representative KCR. Why should any differences among them stop the lower rung folks from growing in the organisation...?
Why can't the head of the party/organisation
( KCR, who owns the party unconditionally whatsoever may be the noise created by anyone to destabilize the harmony of the party at large serving the entire state / it's citizens appropriately )
take a sober decision to set aside the 3 MLAs for a while, and promote a lower rung folk who has toiled enough for the party's success via any of these MLAs' hierarchy, by executing all the tasks assigned to him to his best efforts, to a new corporator for a new area that doesn't exactly belong to any these MLAs fighting with each other on petty issues that is in-turn affecting the lower rung folk's life, career, health, aspirations, and expectations from the party.
Why should any of those 3 MLAs now bother about that lower rung folk getting some well deserved respect and recognition from the party's head for all the hardships that he went thru when they have considered him as just another mere resource while working under them.
If this lower rung folk is now all happy with the party's upper management's decision to develop him as a new corporator for the well being of the party at large, why should that irk any of these 3 MLAs because it really doesn't affect them or their status quo in any of the ways.
To alleviate whatsoever may be the complexity it is, isn't it true that this bold decision by the upper management needs to be respected and welcomed by everyone including these 3 MLAs, as long as they consider themselves as an integral part of the organization at large being driven by the upper management ?
If any one these 3 MLAs are causing a lot of noise and disturbance to the new folk being developed as a new corporator in a new area , it would only speak of their inability to withstand someone from growing in their life,
and it is a fact that these 3 MLAs are now just ridiculing all the hardwork put in earlier by this guy which is not at all appropriate.
It would be appreciable only if everyone can understand that each and every person in an organization/party would have his/her own aspirations to ensure that their hardwork gets recognized properly by the upper management and to get rewarded appropriately for their sizeable efforts.
And that in no way should become an eyesore for others.
At the end of the day, the established head of any organization/party deserves all the rights unconditionally on all of their resources present at any level and it is an undeniable fact whatsoever. Typically there would be only one single head for any party/organization at the top of management pyramid from which all the downstream cascaded uniform flow of the executional power happens unconditionally.
In other words, if a corporator or any other lower rung person, feels that he is not quite sure about the harmony and consensus of the tasks' execution being asked of him by his superiors and if he requests the head of the party, KCR or any of the other senior superiors in the upward chain to confirm that it is indeed inline with the party's global agenda/road map, one should not call him faulty just because he tried to validate the global uniform downstream executional flow with superiors at a level above or a few levels above him.
Above all, whoever tries to establish peace for themselves and for everyone else around them are obviously respected.
And whoever tries to destabilize the harmony by creating a lot of unnecessary entropy affecting the lives of people around them aren't respected.
It sums up the entire philosophical balance that any typical practicalist would look for.
Om Shaantih...Om Shaantih...Om Shaantih...
I think the below quote is my current ask to whomsoever it is that is trying to wreck havoc with my life's Peace.....
P. S : Appreciate if no comments are made by anyone and let it work it's way anonymously to establish my peace.....
No comments:
Post a Comment